This essay may be seen as an exploration voyage, tracking the source of a stream — not the Nile, but the stream of moral decay that increasingly pollutes the nation.

The following briefing on the source of the Catholic Church’s sexual abuse scandal is excerpted from a document delivered to the Holy Father and endorsed by renowned Catholic leaders. I write you as a sympathetic non-Catholic with decades of research experience in identifying the causes of today’s pandemic sexual anarchy and its inevitable fallout in pandemic child sexual abuse.

Without question, the main source of this erotic pollution has been the implementation of the allegedly “scientific” sexual “manifesto” crafted by Prof. Alfred Kinsey in his 1948 tome, Sexual Behavior in the Human Male. Originally funded by the Rockefeller Foundation, Kinsey’s human sexuality disciples today counsel the Church and train its children; its future nuns, brothers, priests and bishops.

Our exploration is launched by a medical malpractice charge against the alleged sex experts who for years have “treated” and then released the predatory priests — and bishops — who victimized so many young people and families. Let Bishop Fabian Bruskewitz lead us. Quote:

Questions should . . . be asked about the clinics and treatment centers used by bishops [and the faulty counsel] by various kinds of “sexologists,” psychologists, and other assorted experts . . . [who advised] ‘recycling’ predatory priests.

It seems to me that just as we face the reality of a coterie of closet pederast priests and even bishops we need to face the reality of a coterie of closet pederast therapists and even psychiatrists. For example, the Chairperson of the Department of Psychiatry at Boston University Hospital, Dr. Richard Pillard attended the nascent North American Man-Boy-Love Association (NAMBLA) conference on “Man-Boy-Love.”

Pillard, famous for his twin study that claimed to prove a genetic basis for homosexuality, urged his fellow NAMBLAlike delegates to welcome pederasty (let us dismiss the misleading hetero/homosexual term, “ephebophilia”) since, said Pillard, “Men and boys who love each other are engaging in a social experiment.”

As Bishop Bruskewitz said, “scientists” too have hidden sexual agendas. Legal precedent for the sexual culpability of psychologists, psychiatrists and other therapists was established by a $5.7 million award in 1994 against one therapeutic center. The crime? They released into the community a sexual predator who they allegedly “treated.”

Let’s explore farther upstream. In 1948, most of our patriarchal state sex laws exacted strict controls on male sexual license and thus favored women, children and the family. In fact, half of all states allowed the death penalty for rape.

US Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis said in the 1890s, “The conduct of life is . . . [largely] determined by the existing legal institutions” and Justice Breyer added in 1998 that “law cases can turn almost entirely on an understanding of the underlying . . . scientific subject matter.”

The “experts” the Church and society relied upon would provide our scientific understanding of sexual subject matters, negating the past expectation that American males should exhibit high-minded sexual responsibility.

In fact, Kinsey’s elite legal and psychiatric colleagues created the “Sex Offenses” section of the first American Law Institute Model Penal Code. Citing 100% to Kinsey’s fraudulent sex data for its claim that everyone was doing every kind of sex act, without any negative public health consequences, the ALI MPC was eventually partially or totally implemented by all 50 state legislatures.

The ALI MPC urged the legalization of fornication, cohabitation, adultery, contraception, alienation of affection, seduction, abortion and prostitution. It winked at bestiality and rape and called for a lowered age of consent and a legal window for child sex abuse if the predator were within five or ten years of his young victim. At this vital tributary, “consent” and not public morality would shape America’s sex laws.

Having funded Kinsey’s fraudulent research, for over a decade the Rockefeller Foundation diverted their monies to the ALI MPC backed by the Group for the Advancement of Psychiatry, which said Kinsey’s data were “the points by which we steered.” GAP called for sexual consent “at the age of 7.”

Instead of prison, the taxpayers would give child molesters parole based on costly therapy shown by a 1996 Government Accounting Office report on 550 therapeutic sex offender programs (1977–1996) to have no valid cure. In 1948 half the states provided the death penalty for rape with age of consent generally between 16 and 18 years. Today, 80% of all convicted child molesters serve no prison time whatsoever and in some states, depending on the age of the offender, the real age of consent can be less than 2.

Moving further upstream, let us ask the North American Man-Boy Love Association — NAMBLA — to take us to their leader, the expert whose sex “science” enabled such leniency toward child molesters. NAMBLA tells us: “Gay liberationists in general, and boy-lovers in particular, should know Kinsey’s work and hold it dear . . . Implicit in Kinsey is the struggle we fight today.”

Kinsey’s influence on society includes the shaping of seminarians, priests and bishops. Indeed, during the nascent NAMBLA Boston conference, circa 1979, Father Paul Shanley echoed Kinsey’s claims that imprisoning a child molester “does far more damage” to the child than did the sex abuse. Kinsey wrote:

When children are constantly warned by parents and teachers against contacts with adults . . . they are ready to become hysterical as soon as any older person approaches . . . or fondles them. . . . Some of the more experienced students of juvenile problems have come to believe that the emotional reactions of the parents, police officers, and other adults who discover that the child has had such a contact, may disturb the child more seriously than the sexual contacts themselves. The current hysteria over sex offenders may very well have serious effects on the ability of many of these children to work out sexual adjustments some years later in their marriages.

So, how did Kinsey lead the struggle for the “boy-lovers” whom the nation and the Church suffer today?

Briefly, 87% of his male research subjects were already aberrant; prisoners, homosexuals, 1,400 sex offenders, at least 650 abused boys, etc., while so few normal women would talk to him that he had to label “wives” women who lived more than a year with a man!

In this way he could fake his data to show that masturbation and fornication were common and critical for later marital success; 10% to 37% of men supposedly were sometime homosexual; 85% of men and 50% of women fornicated; 50% of men and 26% of women were adulterers; 69% of men used prostitutes, 25% of moms had abortions; children supposedly were “sexual from birth” and would benefit from “consensual” sex with each other and adults. Yet we had so little rape, VD or illegitimacy from our closet promiscuity that Kinsey never cited the data. Clearly immorality had no negative societal consequences.

These “data” alleging our religious ancestors were promiscuous hypocrites, were informally taught by Playboy magazine and formally taught in graduate schools, especially law, medicine and psychology. Such fraudulent, nonsensical claims, wreaked havoc personally, legislatively and in the courts, finally filtering down to implementation of the Kinsey model in secondary and primary schools — in concert with implementation at the field level by mass media, Planned Parenthood, SIECUS, etc.

People often ask, “When and how did we get a sex ‘field?’ ” Liberal philosopher, Phillip Rieff, explained how a field of science such as sexology evolves:

Every science has its canon, an established body of knowledge from which students learn . . . advancing knowledge beyond the given limits of the canon . . . [and its] authoritative makers of opinion, the cadre of men empowered to organize ideas into dogma.

Kinsey’s book unleashed the American field of “scientific” sexuality in 1948. Still following our sexuality stream, Kinsey’s erotic dogma is seen in the now-famous 1985 document “The Problem of Sexual Molestation” in the Church, in which Father Thomas Doyle, Ray Mouton and St. Luke’s Dr. Michael Peterson (a closet homosexual, now dead from AIDS) said the Church was unequipped to address sex predators due, and I quote, to its “extreme moral judgmentalism.” Instead, claimed Dr. Peterson, “respected scientists” find pedophilia requires empathy and treatment for assaulting children may be a genetic trait.

Speaking as a Kinsey disciple as the authoritative maker of sexological opinion, Dr. Peterson warned the bishops to turn over all priest offenders to the “experts” or face “malpractice” charges.

[W]here clerics give advice . . . [this is] considered by the civil courts to be beyond their . . . expertise or competence . . . [This could allegedly cause] catastrophic consequences (divorce, suicide) resulting in civil suits.

While Peterson urged the Church to hire sex experts like him, he especially recommended Drs. Fred Berlin and John Money of the Johns Hopkins Sexual Disorders Clinic. They would “rehabilitate” Church pedophiles. The wolves were paid millions to guard the sheep. Peterson again: “[Money and Berlin] are considered by me and most people in the field as the two U.S. experts . . . mental health professionals with good success in treatment of such disorders. . . .”

But Money and Berlin knew Peterson’s warrant of “good success” was false. In 1988 the Maryland press had already reported: “At least eight men were convicted of sexually abusing Maryland children while under treatment at the Johns Hopkins clinic.” Were some or all of those eight pedophile priests? Berlin continued to mislead clergy, judges, mental health professionals and others in the mid-90s, insisting, “pedophilia . . . can be effectively controlled with appropriate psychiatric intervention.”3 Berlin cynically subverted Maryland’s child abuse reporting laws with the full approval of his “boss,” Dr. Paul McHugh. McHugh is the psychiatric advisor to Governor Keating’s new child abuse panel while Berlin has sexually advised the Church for years. Indeed, Dr. Money, Berlin’s “mentor” forced two brothers to make incestuous pornography at Johns Hopkins as part of the boys’ “treatment.”

Apparently more than happy to believe the bill of health given by their sexually permissive therapists, Church officials recycled “treated” pederasts and pedophiles back to parishes and schools. But the therapists too had plenty to hide. Before the Catholic Church lost its insurance coverage for sexual felonies, therapists — psychiatrists, psychologists, social workers and marriage counselors — had already lost their coverage for cases involving sexual malpractice (capped at $25,000 five years later, prudently eliminating most victim lawsuits).

In 1994 the American Psychological Association reported that 50% all therapists had said they counseled patients who were sexually exploited by a prior therapist. The percentage of therapeutically victimized minors is unknown at this time. The APA admitted that — like priests —predatory therapists “substantially” re-offend and are — like priests — also commonly recycled, licenses intact. As an expert witness for sadistic sex offenders, Berlin testified that such men cannot control their sexual barbarism (although they have little difficulty controlling their lust in front of parents or legal authorities).

The APA data imply why the GAO did not find therapy cured sexual predators. Instead, the research finds that sexological training and trainers encourage child molestation.

We are way upstream now. Look at John Money, the world-famous expert whom Peterson foisted on the Church. Few people believe there is a magazine called the Journal of Paedophilia. In a JOP interview, Money told his pedophile and pederast readers that the Johns Hopkins clinic was never meant to stop child molesters No, the clinic was designed to give “leeway to judges” to release child molesters because, said Money, age of consent laws should be eliminated and sex between men and boys is good. Naturally, Money, like his disciple, Fred Berlin, would never report molesters to the police. So say the Church and the world’s sexperts.

The Lancet, the British medical journal wrote:

Dr. Judith A. Reisman and her colleagues demolish the foundations of the two [Kinsey] reports . . . Presumably some at least of those [sex] offenders [they called normals] were also the sources of information on stimulation to orgasm in young children that can only have come from pedophiles — or so it must be hoped.15

Prof. Alfred Kinsey launched the unknown field of American “sexology” in 1948. Briefly note what Kinsey’s bogus data “found,” by using pederasts to sexually violate little babies as young as two months old for sex trials of up to 24 hours around the clock.

For his wholly unscientific sex experiments on at least 317 children, Kinsey’s pederast team used stopwatches to record their little victims,’ “convulsions” and “hysterical weeping (especially among the younger children)” and “striking” the [adult] “partner” who was violently sodomizing the child. Kinsey testified these torturous cries of terror were “orgasms” that the babies enjoyed. Kinsey, the most oft cited sex scientist in American law, was palmed off on the American public by Indiana University and the Rockefeller Foundation as a conservative family man. He was instead a closeted sado-masochistic, bi/homosexual pornographer. This should have been obvious to anyone reading his pederastic research “findings.”

Nonetheless, Kinsey’s child sex experiments and conclusions are still cited in the law, social science and popular literature and still unchallenged by establishment therapists. His infamous books were republished in 1998, without apology, by Indiana University and the Kinsey Institute. And a Francis Ford Coppola film is in the hopper, to star the respected actor Liam Neeson as Kinsey in 2003.

Mass murder of children inside the womb is reflected in the mass rape and murder of children outside the womb. The ultimate source of the child sex abuse scandal in the Church and internationally can be understood only by studying Kinsey and his deviant disciples who train and counsel Church and secular leaders and children.

Child sex abuse in the Church exists within a larger crisis — a 1,331% increase in child sex abuse from 1976– to 1999; roughly 400,000 children prostituted annually in the USA; 67% of all reported sex abuse victims are children; 34% are under 12 years of age; and 64% of all forcible sodomy victims are boys under 12 with age 4 the most common age of assault on boys.

NO scientific data confirm that children are born homosexual. None. Historical and cross-cultural data confirm homosexuality is traumatically created and can sometimes be reversed. Not so pederasty and pedophilia. Even were this treatable, one would expect any really repentant offender to insist on remaining in prison where he could do a great deal of harm for his entire life.

Basic math comparing U.S. Census data to child abuse data solves the issue of sexually predatory homosexuals. Roughly the same number of boys are victimized by the 2% homosexual males as are girls victimized by the 95% heterosexual males. In one liberal study, homosexual pederasts admitted to 150 boy victims each, compared to 19 girl victims per heterosexual pedophile, conservatively an eight-to-one ratio. Labeling boys homosexual allows child abuse to be legitimized as consensual homosexual sex. While thousands of boys have been infected by men with AIDS, the adults who kill these boys by sexual assault are not prosecuted for child abuse or murder. See my Web site, drjudithreisman.org, for extensive documentation on this issue. The Department of Justice quietly reported 58,200 “non-family child abductions” in 1999, two/thirds involving sexual abuse; 35% were boys, commonly kidnapped by the 2% homosexual male population, bearing out the disproportionately high rate of homo-tohetero child abuse.

Child sexual abuse has mushroomed in all societies that have experienced the pornography explosion- — Ireland, Israel, England, Japan, Scotland, Sweden and others.

Even the stinging literary observations of brilliant and divergent international social critics such as Dickens, Dostoyevsky, Swift, Hawthorne and Steinbeck never described such sex crimes against children. The few authors, such as Virginia Wolf, who have addressed such brutality are the exception to the rule that proves the rule.

At least 200,000 “credentialed” (that is, licensed) sexology trained professionals now teach Kinsey bogus pansexual credo in most universities, medical schools, law schools, parochial and public schools, kindergarten through doctoral level, setting standards for sexual belief and behavior worldwide.

Now that we are at the source of the pollution, let us look briefly at the Institute for the Advanced Study of Human Sexuality, which has long malpracticed and victimized seminarians and clergy. Led by Kinsey co-author and sometime lover Wardell Pomeroy, this “‘institute” created the SAR, “Sexual Attitude Restructuring,” SAR for short.

SAR is a three-day or months-long brainwashing that bombards participants with multiple movie screens showing men, women, and sometimes children and animals engaging in autoerotic, heterosexual and homosexual sex, dubbed the “f-arama.” A number of Bishops, like Rembert Weakland of Milwaukee, have had their seminarians undergo the SAR. Jason Berry in Lead us Not Into Temptation reports that Peterson himself inflicted the SAR on his volatile pederast clients at St. Luke’s reports. Seminary students and St. Luke’s child molesters alike have been violated and programmed by films of sodomy and orgies since the 70s. A personal interview from a highly reliable source confirmed recently that St. Luke SAR orgies included child pornography. The IASHS is documented as producing child pornography, using staff and faculty children that they later sold to Hustler magazine to incite incest and sex with other children. The SAR eliminated “restricting attitudes about . . . sexuality” reports Michael Rose. The “porno flicks. . . . were supposedly put together by doctors who worked for clinical sex study institutes.” In fact, Kinsey had his wife, faculty and staff set the standard for the sexology field by producing home made porno flicks at Indiana University. Ah the rarified atmosphere of academe.

A 1989 Vatican document warned that pornography “can eat away at tenderness and compassion and can foster insensitivity and even brutality.”

The SAR programmed further insensitivity and brutality into pederasts, seminarians, clergy and future bishops. Pornography is a common obsession of child molesters, including clergy. The kinds of doctors who create such pornography are addressed in the Holy Father’s book, Love and Responsibility:

Some doctors have a narrowly biological view of things formed under the influence of the “myth of orgasm” which causes them to give advice completely at variance with ordinary human knowledge and experience of sexual matters (p. 287).

American bishops did not all awaken one morning and say, “Oh! Our seminarians and pederasts in treatment are a captive audience — let us all force them to watch sodomy and rape films and see what happens.” There has been no admission by the responsible universities that graduate these “professionals” that their sexuality curriculum was fraudulent and dangerous. Yet, both Bishops and society have been incited by the pansexual curriculum taught by the Kinsey Institute at IU and its disciples at Johns Hopkins, the IASHS and their disciples at New York U and U of Pennsylvania, etc.

The pornography that celebrates Kinsey’s myth of orgasm is the primary form of education for certificates and degrees given to legions of “sex educators” who teach our children. Pictured in Meditations on the Gift of Sexuality (1977), Dr. Pomeroy’s staff, faculty and students, adults and children, perform solo, group and couple sex acts, both homosexual and heterosexual. Were even liberal juries to know the truth, and to see these obscene photos, few would judge these performers to be qualified as expert witnesses in litigation addressing any aspect of human sexuality. Yet these sexual deviants counsel clerical child offenders and train schoolchil- dren, mental health professionals and seminarians, and regularly appear as courtroom experts.

You see, the sexologists whom Bishop Bruskewitz denounced are given college degrees, all the way to doctorates, for watching months and months of pornography and earning college credit for “erotic massage,” “self-massage,” “masturbation,” and the like (bring your own oil). As academic dean of the institute and an expert defense witness, Pomeroy, now deceased, solicited funds from the “Adult Film Association” to film child pornography while, as noted, selling their Institute-produced child pornography to Hustler magazine. The photos are available as courtroom evidence.

Summing up our exploration voyage, I briefly covered NAMBLA’s debt to Prof. Kinsey’s manifesto; the Kinseyan SAR incitement to sexual misconduct via its pornographic brainwashing; the mass production of credentialed, Kinseyan “sexperts” by “sexology” institutions that train forensic sexpert witnesses; the role of Kinseyan sex therapists in advising and training the Church; and the need for offensive legal action from the Catholic faithful for medical malpractice; willful negligence and malicious disregard for the safety of children, which has certainly caused “suicide and divorce” and the destruction of scores, if not hundreds, of reputations and vocations.

Adults and children have been victimized by fraudulently “treated” priests who were recycled back into society by therapists who were either closet pederasts themselves or whose training was just so bogus that they were incompetent and negligent as a function of their professional training. Seminarians were injured by therapists who relied on the Kinsey credo in admissions criteria, psychological testing and “counseling.” Some have been injured physically by assault and by illegal, even fatal, sexual acts taught during their bogus reformation via the SAR sexual incitement, one could arguably say, recruitment, sessions.

These findings of the sinister, root causes of the sexual abuse scandal and of fraud and malpractice, should also be considered for possible use in making direct or third-party legal claims against identified sexologists and their institutions, including the current Kinsey Institute, the cradle of the “sexology” profession. The Institute for the Advanced Study of Human Sexuality and advisers like Berlin and Money, along with their institute and university sponsors are possibly subject to civil liability for such abuses. The fraudulent nature of the Kinseyan sex “science” credo (the science “canon”) and the role that accredited therapists have played in shaping the ALI Model Penal Code, our sex laws and public policies are supported by witnesses and by admissible documentation that is available for use in civil and criminal trials.

Since the 1950s, the criminal justice system, like the Church, has largely abandoned punishment in favor of the Kinseyan Model Penal Code’s failed theories of “consent,” therapy and parole — with the same tragic and sinister results.

God can draw good even out of the worst evil. My plea is that the Catholic faithful will view this tragedy as a catastrophic “opportunity” to take to the courtrooms and legislatures everywhere; to obtain rulings and laws to turn off the spigots that spew Kinsey’s pansexual virus into the stream that has infected us all. There is extensive documentation available for legislators and attorneys who are interested in seeking to help the Church and our nation.

Once attaining success in the courtroom, the bogus Kinseyan sex credo may finally be excised from our larger society. Until then, the wolves will still be paid millions to train the shepherds who guard the sheep.